The local reality
It is estimated that approximately 3%
of children in the Borough (1,200) are in “high” need.
Black children, particularly boys, are significantly “over
represented” amongst children being “looked after” (in care),
on the child protection register and being excluded from school.
Teenage pregnancy rates are comparatively
high.
Immunisation rates for children are comparatively low.
There is a comparatively large number
of families in poor / over
crowded accommodation.
Approximately £17m is spent on children’s social services
alone (excluding expenditure on asylum seeking children and families).
At any given time social workers are
working with more than 400
families, and health visitors and school nurses with more than
300 families, where the children are considered to be “at risk”.
Sign
up for our free weekly newsletter
Comment on this story on the forum
|
|
A single structure for child protection
bringing together local health, education and social services
will be set up in Hammersmith and Fulham within months. In total,
35 Children's Trusts pathfinders will be created around the country,
following the recommendations of the Laming Report, which investigated
into the death of Victoria Climbie.
Hammersmith and Fulham have the
second highest rate of children in need among all the London boroughs
(Borough Profile 2002). It is estimated that approximately 3%
of children in the Borough (1,200) are in “high” need. This includes
young people
who are persistent offenders, children who are on the child protection
register, disabled children, children who are looked after and
children who are chronically ill. There are also those considered
“vulnerable”, defined as being children who are at risk of adverse
outcomes without some intervention, support or service; perhaps
as a result of their parents separating, or because of an episode
of ill–health.
The Laming Report was very
critical about the lack of co-ordination between child protection
and child welfare services, which contributed to the service failure
resulting in Victoria's death. In Hammersmith and Fulham, lack
of co-ordination and poor communication between a plethora of
structures and services are problems already identified. "Children
are still potentially at risk because of the liability of the
services to fail to communicate properly and co-ordinate intervention.
There is also duplication of effort. Children and families sometimes
experience the system as difficult to access and user-unfriendly",
says the report by the council.
The new structure in the form of
the Children's Trust would provide a single system for the identification,
referral and tracking of children considered to be vulnerable
and in need of help to prevent them from experiencing exclusion,
disadvantage, harm or being involved in crime or drug abuse. The
Trust would develop a system for ensuring that children would
be subject
to a single assessment process; and have one "case manager"
responsible for co-ordinating the child's support programme.
The report with the proposal for the creation of a local Children's
Trust was presented and analysed by Health & Social Services
Scrutiny Panel and Leader's Committee. A brief of the report bellow.
Why do Hammersmith and Fulham Council want to create a Children's
Trust?
- Resources have had to be transferred from preventive
provision for vulnerable children to children with high levels
of need. (Vulnerable children are those who are at risk of adverse
outcome without some intervention, support or service. Children
have high levels of need because they face significant and lasting
difficulties or disadvantage.)
- Although there is much
more investment by health, education and social services in provision
for children in high need, it is not well coordinated.
- At the high need end of the spectrum, services are often crisis
orientated and not necessarily designed to bring about lasting
improvements in life opportunities for vulnerable children.
- There are a plethora of structures and services upon which vulnerable
children and children with high levels of need depend. These children's
needs are complex and so it is inevitable that a range of provision
will be required. Nevertheless the end result can be poor communication
and poor co-ordination between services, resulting in children's
needs not being met and (at worst) children suffering preventable
harm.
- Parents and carers complain of their children and themselves
suffering as a consequence of this poor co-ordination of services.
The Best Value Review of Services for Disabled Children and Children
with Special Needs stated that parents and carers of disabled
children report that their children experience repeated reassessments
and that the parents constantly have to be the "broker"
between education, health and social services in the arrangement
of services by different agencies.
- Foster and adoptive parents
report that they cannot access schooling or child and adolescent
mental health services. Schools, Health Visitors and GPs report
that they cannot obtain social work support for children experiencing
social difficulties. Social workers report that they cannot engage
GPs in child protection cases. Whilst these experiences are by
no means universal, these reports are sufficiently frequent to
indicate that they are sufficiently common place for us to be
concerned about the co-ordination of services in the Borough.
How would it work?
- At the core would be the establishment by the three partner
agencies (health, education and social services) of joint commissioning,
planning and development of services for vulnerable children and
children in high need.
- The Childrens Trust will have a single system for the identification,
referral and tracking of children considered to be vulnerable
and in need of help to prevent them from experiencing exclusion,
disadvantage, harm or being involved in crime or drug abuse. The
Trust will develop a system for ensuring that children would be
subject to a single assessment process; and have one "case
manager" responsible for co-ordinating the child's support
programme.
- The Trust will be accountable to the Council and The Primary
Care Trust.
- Management Board will consist of elected members of the Council,
PCT Board Members, the Managing Director, Director of Social Services,
Director of Education, Chief Executive of the Primary Care Trust,
Director of Childrens Trust, representatives of the Police and
representatives of parents / carers. These arrangements may be
revised as plans for the Trust develop.
- A consultation forum representing children and young people
will be established. This will be organised by the Childrens Rights
Officer.
- The Childrens Trust will
also consult on a regular basis with parents groups, carers groups
and through the Children's Strategic Partnership (which is to
be developed from the existing Children's Fund Partnership).
|