Chiswick Curve Decision To Be Challenged in High Court
A view from the A4 of rejected scheme
Starbones, the company behind the planned 32-storey development at Chiswick Roundabout, is taking action in the High Court over the blocking of their scheme by a Minister.
James Brokenshire, who was the Secretary of State at the Department of Local Government and Housing, overruled the Planning Inspectorate’s decision to allow the scheme earlier this year. The inspectorate had in turn overruled Hounslow Council’s planning department who had rejected the plan.
Starbones claim that the Secretary of State’s decision is unlawful because he “failed to have regard to the relative impact on heritage assets of either the implementation of an existing planning permission, or the development of the Site in accordance with the Second Defendant’s (Hounslow Council) emerging policy for the area”. They say the Minister did not give due reasoning for rejecting the Inspector’s recommendation on this matter.
The existing planning permission referred to is for the Citadel which was approved for the same site back in 2002. This could now be considered as a fall back option and Starbones say it would have a more severe impact on local heritage assets because of the design.
In addition they say that the Minister failed to give weight to the requirement in the plan for increased provision of housing and affordable housing. The Secretary of State said that ‘limited weight’ should be given to the DRLP, the plan which increased the Council’s housing requirement to an average of over 2,000 dwellings per annum and identifies the Great West Corridor as an Opportunity Area.
The development Chiswick Curve would be a mixed use building of two towers, one 32-storeys and one 25-storeys, that would contain up to 327 flats.
After rejection by Hounslow Council an appeal was made to the Planning Inspectorate and Paul Griffiths held a 15 day inquiry in June 2018 at which he concluded that the proposals complied with the development plan for the area. He said, ‘the Chiswick Curve is a quite brilliant response to the difficult problems presented by the immediate context of this site.”
The inspector noted that the Council had published a Local Plan Review for the Great West Corridor which conceded that buildings of up to 65 metres in height could be appropriate at this location providing a landmark for the eastern gateway to the area.
The Chiswick Curve from Strand on the Green
It was also noted that ‘implementable planning permission’ was in place at the site for the Citadel tower which was 60 metres tall and this might be viewed as a fall back option. Originally it was deemed to be non-viable but it was proposed that it could be made viable by the addition of advertising hoardings. No payments would be need to be made to the local authority or the Mayor’s Community Infrastructure Levy is this scheme was revived.
The Inspector said that concerns about the impact on the views over the area particular across the Strand on the Green conservation area would already be affected by planned developments in the area including the Brentford Stadium development and the Citroen site at Capital Interchange Way. He added, “it would be far better for that stratum to be properly articulated, and designed, and for there to be a clear hierarchy, and a ‘marker’ on the appeal site.”
With regard to Kew Gardens he said, “the idea that Kew Gardens can be completely ‘protected’ from further visual intrusions of the city beyond is a battle that has been fought and lost.”
The Secretary of State disagreed with these conclusions on the basis that the harm to heritage assets such as Strand on the Green, Kew Gardens, Gunnersbury Park and the Kew Green Conservation Area outweighed any benefits provided by the scheme.
At this point it is not known when this appeal will be considered by the High Court.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |
September 3, 2019